MediaWiki End of Life (EOL) Dates & Support Timeline
Complete end-of-life dates, support windows, and security status for all MediaWiki versions. Data sourced from endoflife.date and official vendor documentation. Updated at every deploy.
Running an EOL version? Get matched with support options — free ↓| Version | Latest Release | Release Date | EOL Date | Days | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.31 LTS | 1.31.16 | Jun 13, 2018 | Sep 30, 2021 | 1774 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.32 | 1.32.6 | Jan 10, 2019 | Jan 24, 2020 | 2389 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.33 | 1.33.4 | Jul 2, 2019 | Jun 30, 2020 | 2231 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.34 | 1.34.4 | Dec 19, 2019 | Nov 30, 2020 | 2078 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.35 LTS | 1.35.14 | Sep 25, 2020 | Dec 21, 2023 | 962 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.36 | 1.36.4 | May 28, 2021 | Jun 3, 2022 | 1528 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.37 | 1.37.6 | Nov 18, 2021 | Nov 30, 2022 | 1348 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.38 | 1.38.7 | Jun 2, 2022 | Jun 30, 2023 | 1136 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.39 LTS | 1.39.17 | Nov 30, 2022 | Dec 31, 2025 | 221 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.40 | 1.40.4 | Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 28, 2024 | 772 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.41 | 1.41.5 | Dec 21, 2023 | Dec 31, 2024 | 586 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.42 | 1.42.7 | Jun 27, 2024 | Jun 30, 2025 | 405 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.43 LTS | 1.43.9 | Dec 21, 2024 | Dec 31, 2027 | 509 days remaining | Active |
| 1.44 | 1.44.6 | Jul 2, 2025 | Jul 31, 2026 | 9 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.45 | 1.45.4 | Dec 4, 2025 | Dec 31, 2026 | 144 days remaining | Warning |
| 1.46 | 1.46.0 | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2027 | 356 days remaining | Active |
Live EOL badge for your README — updates automatically at every build.
[](https://endoflife.ai/mediawiki)
What does MediaWiki end of life mean for your organization?
When a version of MediaWiki reaches end of life, the maintainers stop issuing security patches. Vulnerabilities discovered after this date are publicly disclosed on the National Vulnerability Database, exploit code appears on GitHub, and your systems remain permanently exposed.
The CVE blind spot: Most vulnerability scanners check for known CVEs but do not flag the accumulation of unpatched vulnerabilities in EOL software. With a zero-day, nobody knows about the vulnerability. With EOL software, the vulnerability is public — listed, rated, and often weaponized — but no patch will ever exist. This is the most dangerous gap in enterprise security posture.
Organizations running EOL MediaWiki should treat it as a vulnerability class in their risk register, apply compensating controls (network segmentation, enhanced monitoring, access restriction), and prioritize migration to a supported version.
Your options when MediaWiki reaches end of life
There are four realistic paths. Which one is right depends far more on how long the system needs to keep running than on the version you are on today.
| Option | Best when | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Move to a supported version | The system will outlive the current version's support window and you can schedule the work | Budget for compatibility testing, not just the upgrade itself — that is where the real cost sits |
| Replace the component | The project is unmaintained, or a better-supported alternative exists | The replacement has its own lifecycle and its own end-of-life date — you are changing vendors, not escaping the problem |
| Buy extended support | Migration is genuinely underway but cannot finish before the deadline, or the workload is frozen by certification or a third-party application | A bridge, not a destination — every year purchased is a year the migration still has to happen |
| Document accepted risk | The system is isolated, short-lived, or scheduled for retirement | Only defensible with real compensating controls and a written decision — auditors treat undocumented end-of-life software as a finding |
How to choose, in one question: how many more years does this system need to run? Under a year, extended support (where it exists) is usually cheaper than an emergency migration. One to three years, migrate — support purchased repeatedly costs more than doing the project once, and the project only gets harder as the version ages. Indefinitely, migrate now and plan the next migration before it surprises you.
Worth saying plainly, because vendors selling extended support rarely will: extended support is often the more expensive choice over a multi-year horizon. It is the right answer when a deadline is genuinely unreachable, not as a default. Compare the annual fee against the one-time cost of migrating before committing to either.
Extended Support Options
If you cannot migrate immediately, extended support vendors provide continued security patches for EOL MediaWiki versions. This is a bridge, not a permanent solution — plan your migration in parallel.
MediaWiki has 13 versions past end of life — security patches have stopped, but CVE disclosures haven't. The good news: extended support for MediaWiki exists — vetted vendors ship security patches for years past the official date. Tell us where to reach you and we'll reply with matched options and pricing guidance.