Red Hat Fuse End of Life (EOL) Dates & Support Timeline
Complete end-of-life dates, support windows, and security status for all Red Hat Fuse versions. Dates read at the vendor's own lifecycle pages (access.redhat.com). Updated at every deploy.
Every tracked Red Hat Fuse version is past end of life; the most recent to reach it, 7, did so on June 30, 2024. The full Red Hat Fuse lifecycle, with every version's release and end-of-support date, is in the table below.
Running an EOL version? Get matched with support options — free ↓| Version | Latest Release | Release Date | EOL Date | Extended Support | Days | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | — | Apr 1, 2013 | Jan 31, 2022 | Jan 31, 2024 Red Hat Extended Life Cycle Support (ended) |
1722 days past EOL | EOL |
| 7 | — | May 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2024 | Jun 30, 2026 Red Hat Extended Life Cycle Support (ended) |
841 days past EOL | EOL |
Live EOL badge for your README — updates automatically at every build.
[](https://endoflife.ai/redhat-fuse)
Red Hat Fuse lifecycle status — the real story
Red Hat Fuse is Red Hat's integration platform built on Apache Camel. Fuse 7 has passed the end of Maintenance support and the paid ELS 1 add-on has also ended. Red Hat added an ELS 2 phase, which is advice and migration guidance only, with no bug or security fixes, so it is not counted as extended support here.
Red Hat Fuse release and support pattern
A line typically stays in standard support for about 7.5 years from its release to its standard-support end date.
Of the 2 release lines tracked, 2 are past end of life and 0 are still within support. The newest line, 7, was released May 30, 2018. Upstream also publishes an extended-support phase for 2 lines, shown in the table above.
Computed from the tracked release data at every build — the figures above are the dates in the table, restated, not an editorial estimate.
What does Red Hat Fuse end of life mean for your organization?
When a version of Red Hat Fuse reaches end of life, the maintainers stop issuing security patches. Vulnerabilities discovered after this date are publicly disclosed on the National Vulnerability Database, exploit code appears on GitHub, and your systems remain permanently exposed.
The CVE blind spot: A CVE-based scan does not show the accumulation of unpatched vulnerabilities in EOL software. Some scanners flag unsupported versions of common products, but coverage varies, and none of them give you the date in advance. With a zero-day, nobody knows about the vulnerability. With EOL software, the vulnerability is public — listed, rated, and often weaponized — but no vendor patch is coming. This is one of the most dangerous gaps in enterprise security posture.
Organizations running EOL Red Hat Fuse should treat it as a vulnerability class in their risk register, apply compensating controls (network segmentation, enhanced monitoring, access restriction), and prioritize migration to a supported version.
Your options when Red Hat Fuse reaches end of life
There are four realistic paths. Which one is right depends far more on how long the system needs to keep running than on the version you are on today.
| Option | Best when | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Move to a supported version | The system will outlive the current version's support window and you can schedule the work | Budget for compatibility testing, not just the upgrade itself — that is where the real cost sits |
| Replace the component | The project is unmaintained, or a better-supported alternative exists | The replacement has its own lifecycle and its own end-of-life date — you are changing vendors, not escaping the problem |
| Buy extended support | Migration is genuinely underway but cannot finish before the deadline, or the workload is frozen by certification or a third-party application | A bridge, not a destination — every year purchased is a year the migration still has to happen |
| Document accepted risk | The system is isolated, short-lived, or scheduled for retirement | Only defensible with real compensating controls and a written decision — auditors treat undocumented end-of-life software as a finding |
How to choose, in one question: how many more years does this system need to run? Under a year, extended support (where it exists) is usually cheaper than an emergency migration. One to three years, migrate — support purchased repeatedly costs more than doing the project once, and the project only gets harder as the version ages. Indefinitely, migrate now and plan the next migration before it surprises you.
Worth saying plainly, because vendors selling extended support rarely will: extended support is often the more expensive choice over a multi-year horizon. It is the right answer when a deadline is genuinely unreachable, not as a default. Compare the annual fee against the one-time cost of migrating before committing to either.
Formalizing decisions like this across your estate? Our free EOL policy template is a ready-to-adopt policy with risk tiers, remediation SLAs, and audit mapping — no signup, free to use and share.
Extended Support Options
If you cannot migrate immediately, check whether the vendor or a third party sells extended support with security patches for your Red Hat Fuse version; coverage varies by product and version. Where it exists it is a bridge, not a permanent solution — plan your migration in parallel.
Red Hat Fuse has 2 versions past end of life — security patches have stopped, but CVE disclosures haven't. Extended support past the official date exists for many products in this position — whether it exists for Red Hat Fuse is exactly what we check. Tell us where to reach you and we'll reply with matched options and pricing guidance — or an honest "no vendor covers this."