Foreman End of Life (EOL) Dates & Support Timeline
Complete end-of-life dates, support windows, and security status for all Foreman versions. Data from endoflife.date, checked against the vendor's own lifecycle pages where we have read them (share on /accuracy). Updated at every deploy.
Foreman 5.0 is supported, with no end-of-life or end-of-support date announced yet. 48 of 50 tracked Foreman versions are past end of life; the most recent to reach it, 3.18, did so on September 8, 2026. The full Foreman lifecycle, with every version's release and end-of-support date, is in the table below.
Running an EOL version? Get matched with support options — free ↓| Version | Latest Release | Release Date | EOL Date | Days | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | 1.2.3 | Jul 1, 2013 | Jan 29, 2014 | 4665 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.3 | 1.3.2 | Oct 14, 2013 | May 9, 2014 | 4565 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.4 | 1.4.5 | Jan 29, 2014 | Sep 10, 2014 | 4441 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.5 | 1.5.3 | May 9, 2014 | Dec 2, 2014 | 4358 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.6 | 1.6.3 | Sep 10, 2014 | Apr 28, 2015 | 4211 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.7 | 1.7.5 | Dec 2, 2014 | Aug 18, 2015 | 4099 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.8 | 1.8.4 | Apr 28, 2015 | Dec 23, 2015 | 3972 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.9 | 1.9.3 | Aug 18, 2015 | Mar 31, 2016 | 3873 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.10 | 1.10.4 | Dec 23, 2015 | Jul 8, 2016 | 3774 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.11 | 1.11.4 | Mar 31, 2016 | Oct 5, 2016 | 3685 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.12 | 1.12.4 | Jul 8, 2016 | Jan 13, 2017 | 3585 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.13 | 1.13.4 | Oct 5, 2016 | May 9, 2017 | 3469 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.14 | 1.14.3 | Jan 13, 2017 | Nov 29, 2017 | 3265 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.15 | 1.15.7 | May 9, 2017 | Apr 11, 2018 | 3132 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.16 | 1.16.2 | Nov 29, 2017 | Jul 12, 2018 | 3040 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.17 | 1.17.4 | Apr 11, 2018 | Aug 30, 2018 | 2991 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.18 | 1.18.3 | Jul 12, 2018 | Nov 15, 2018 | 2914 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.19 | 1.19.1 | Aug 30, 2018 | Feb 26, 2019 | 2811 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.20 | 1.20.3 | Nov 15, 2018 | Jul 2, 2019 | 2685 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.21 | 1.21.4 | Feb 26, 2019 | Sep 18, 2019 | 2607 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.22 | 1.22.2 | Jun 4, 2019 | Dec 9, 2019 | 2525 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.23 | 1.23.2 | Sep 10, 2019 | Apr 2, 2020 | 2410 days past EOL | EOL |
| 1.24 | 1.24.3 | Dec 9, 2019 | Jul 2, 2020 | 2319 days past EOL | EOL |
| 2.0 | 2.0.3 | Apr 2, 2020 | Oct 28, 2020 | 2201 days past EOL | EOL |
| 2.1 | 2.1.4 | Jul 2, 2020 | Dec 1, 2020 | 2167 days past EOL | EOL |
| 2.2 | 2.2.3 | Oct 28, 2020 | Mar 19, 2021 | 2059 days past EOL | EOL |
| 2.3 | 2.3.5 | Dec 1, 2020 | Jun 9, 2021 | 1977 days past EOL | EOL |
| 2.4 | 2.4.1 | Mar 19, 2021 | Sep 7, 2021 | 1887 days past EOL | EOL |
| 2.5 | 2.5.4 | Jun 2, 2021 | Dec 9, 2021 | 1794 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.0 | 3.0.2 | Sep 7, 2021 | Mar 15, 2022 | 1698 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.1 | 3.1.3 | Dec 9, 2021 | Jun 9, 2022 | 1612 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.2 | 3.2.1 | Mar 15, 2022 | Sep 8, 2022 | 1521 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.3 | 3.3.1 | Jun 9, 2022 | Dec 14, 2022 | 1424 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.4 | 3.4.1 | Sep 8, 2022 | Mar 21, 2023 | 1327 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.5 | 3.5.3 | Dec 14, 2022 | Jun 20, 2023 | 1236 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.6 | 3.6.2 | Mar 21, 2023 | Oct 10, 2023 | 1124 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.7 | 3.7.1 | Jun 20, 2023 | Dec 19, 2023 | 1054 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.8 | 3.8.0 | Oct 10, 2023 | Mar 22, 2024 | 960 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.9 | 3.9.3 | Dec 19, 2023 | Jun 25, 2024 | 865 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.10 | 3.10.1 | Mar 22, 2024 | Sep 19, 2024 | 779 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.11 | 3.11.5 | Jun 25, 2024 | Dec 3, 2024 | 704 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.12 | 3.12.1 | Sep 19, 2024 | Mar 19, 2025 | 598 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.13 | 3.13.1 | Dec 3, 2024 | Jun 9, 2025 | 516 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.14 | 3.14.0 | Mar 19, 2025 | Sep 9, 2025 | 424 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.15 | 3.15.1 | Jun 9, 2025 | Dec 9, 2025 | 333 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.16 | 3.16.3 | Sep 9, 2025 | Mar 10, 2026 | 242 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.17 | 3.17.2 | Dec 9, 2025 | Jun 9, 2026 | 151 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.18 | 3.18.2 | Mar 10, 2026 | Sep 8, 2026 | 60 days past EOL | EOL |
| 3.19 | 3.19.2 | Jun 9, 2026 | TBD | Supported | Active |
| 5.0 | 5.0.1 | Sep 8, 2026 | TBD | Supported | Active |
[](https://endoflife.ai/foreman)
Foreman release and support pattern
Across the 50 release lines with a published release date, Foreman has shipped a new line roughly every 3 months (median interval). A line typically stays supported for about 6 months from its release to its end-of-life date (measured on the 48 lines with both dates published).
Of the 50 release lines tracked, 48 are past end of life and 2 are still within support. The newest line, 5.0, was released September 8, 2026. No end-of-life date is currently published for the 2 supported lines.
Computed from the tracked release data at every build — the figures above are the dates in the table, restated, not an editorial estimate.
What does Foreman end of life mean for your organization?
When a version of Foreman reaches end of life, the maintainers stop issuing security patches. Vulnerabilities discovered after this date are publicly disclosed on the National Vulnerability Database, exploit code appears on GitHub, and your systems remain permanently exposed.
The CVE blind spot: A CVE-based scan does not show the accumulation of unpatched vulnerabilities in EOL software. Some scanners flag unsupported versions of common products, but coverage varies, and none of them give you the date in advance. With a zero-day, nobody knows about the vulnerability. With EOL software, the vulnerability is public — listed, rated, and often weaponized — but no vendor patch is coming. This is one of the most dangerous gaps in enterprise security posture.
Organizations running EOL Foreman should treat it as a vulnerability class in their risk register, apply compensating controls (network segmentation, enhanced monitoring, access restriction), and prioritize migration to a supported version.
Your options when Foreman reaches end of life
There are four realistic paths. Which one is right depends far more on how long the system needs to keep running than on the version you are on today.
| Option | Best when | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Move to a supported version | The system will outlive the current version's support window and you can schedule the work | Budget for compatibility testing, not just the upgrade itself — that is where the real cost sits |
| Replace the component | The project is unmaintained, or a better-supported alternative exists | The replacement has its own lifecycle and its own end-of-life date — you are changing vendors, not escaping the problem |
| Buy extended support | Migration is genuinely underway but cannot finish before the deadline, or the workload is frozen by certification or a third-party application | A bridge, not a destination — every year purchased is a year the migration still has to happen |
| Document accepted risk | The system is isolated, short-lived, or scheduled for retirement | Only defensible with real compensating controls and a written decision — auditors treat undocumented end-of-life software as a finding |
How to choose, in one question: how many more years does this system need to run? Under a year, extended support (where it exists) is usually cheaper than an emergency migration. One to three years, migrate — support purchased repeatedly costs more than doing the project once, and the project only gets harder as the version ages. Indefinitely, migrate now and plan the next migration before it surprises you.
Worth saying plainly, because vendors selling extended support rarely will: extended support is often the more expensive choice over a multi-year horizon. It is the right answer when a deadline is genuinely unreachable, not as a default. Compare the annual fee against the one-time cost of migrating before committing to either.
Formalizing decisions like this across your estate? Our free EOL policy template is a ready-to-adopt policy with risk tiers, remediation SLAs, and audit mapping — no signup, free to use and share.
Extended Support Options
If you cannot migrate immediately, check whether the vendor or a third party sells extended support with security patches for your Foreman version; coverage varies by product and version. Where it exists it is a bridge, not a permanent solution — plan your migration in parallel.
Foreman has 48 versions past end of life — security patches have stopped, but CVE disclosures haven't. Extended support past the official date exists for many products in this position — whether it exists for Foreman is exactly what we check. Tell us where to reach you and we'll reply with matched options and pricing guidance — or an honest "no vendor covers this."