Process — Track · Score · Plan · Bridge

End-of-Life Software
Management

Updated July 16, 2026 · endoflife.ai · Process Guide · EOL Management

Software end of life isn't an event you react to — it's a schedule you manage. Every OS, runtime, framework, and database you run has a published date after which patches stop, which means EOL management can be a repeatable process instead of a recurring surprise. This page lays out that process in four stages — track, score, plan, bridge — and points to the free tool for each one.

The Four Stages at a Glance

Stage Question It Answers Tool
1. Track What do we run, and when does each version lose support? EOL Checker · Stack Scanner · API
2. Score Of everything past or near EOL, what's actually dangerous? EOL Risk Score
3. Plan What do we migrate, in what order, by when? Risk-ranked findings + Timeline
4. Bridge What covers the gap where migration can't finish in time? Extended-support matching

Stage 1 — Track the Dates

Tracking is inventory plus dates. endoflife.ai maintains lifecycle data for 480+ products, built on open data from endoflife.date, so the lookup side is solved: check a single product in the EOL Checker, turn a requirements.txt, package.json, Gemfile, or composer.json into a full lifecycle report with the Stack Scanner, or script recurring checks through the API — the free tier allows 500 requests per day. The full workflow for assembling your side of the equation is covered in building a legacy software inventory, and if you're wondering why your vulnerability scanner hasn't already done this for you, unsupported software detection explains the blind spot.

Stage 2 — Score the Risk

Tracking usually surfaces more EOL findings than you can act on at once. The EOL Risk Score converts each one into a 0–100 number from four weighted factors: EOL recency (up to 40 points — unpatched exposure compounds), attack surface (30), CISA KEV exposure (20), and extended-support availability (10). Two products that went EOL the same day can score very differently, and that difference is your priority order.

Stage 3 — Plan Migrations

With a ranked list, planning becomes sequencing: highest scores first, grouped where one migration unblocks several findings (an OS upgrade often clears multiple runtime issues at once). For each item, set a target version with meaningful support runway left — the product index shows every tracked version's dates, and the timeline shows what's expiring next so this quarter's plan accounts for next quarter's deadlines.

Stage 4 — Bridge With Extended Support

Some migrations won't finish before the risk becomes unacceptable — compliance-bound workloads, internet-facing systems, rewrites measured in quarters. For those, a market of extended-lifecycle-support providers sells continued security patches for EOL software, buying time without pretending the migration away. The extended-support market overview maps that market by category, and we'll match you with a provider suited to your stack — free, no obligation. Extended support is a bridge, not a destination: the plan from Stage 3 still runs; it just runs under patch coverage.

Then the loop repeats New EOL dates are announced every month and your stack changes with every deploy. Re-run tracking on a schedule — the API makes it scriptable — and the other three stages stay small.

Start managing, not reacting

Check a product now, or get matched with extended support for anything already past EOL.

Free · no obligation
Get Matched With Extended Support → Check a Product Now

Frequently Asked Questions

What is EOL management?

The ongoing process of handling software as it approaches and passes end of life: tracking support dates for everything you run, scoring the risk of anything already unsupported, planning migrations in priority order, and bridging unavoidable gaps with extended support. It's a loop, not a one-off project — new EOL dates land every month.

Should I migrate or buy extended support?

Migrate when the work can finish before the risk becomes unacceptable. Bridge with extended support when it can't — typically for compliance-critical or internet-facing workloads where a rushed migration is riskier than a paid patch stream. Extended support buys time; it doesn't remove the eventual migration.

How do I know which EOL software to fix first?

Rank findings with the EOL Risk Score, a 0–100 benchmark built from four weighted factors: how long the version has been past EOL (40 points max), its attack surface (30), CISA KEV exposure (20), and whether extended support exists as a fallback (10). Work down from the highest score.

Can EOL management be automated?

The tracking stage can. The endoflife.ai API — free tier of 500 requests per day across 480+ products — lets you script recurring checks in CI/CD or an inventory job, and the stack scanner turns dependency files into lifecycle reports. Scoring is automatic; planning and bridging decisions stay human.

The Monthly EOL Digest™

Once a month — critical end-of-life dates, CVE blind spots, and lifecycle changes worth knowing about.

✓ You're on the list.