endoflife.ai
EOL Checker Products EOL Watch Get Support

Apache Tomcat Marks Dead Versions “Unknown” — and Your Scanner Reads That as Clean

By Scott Bissett  ·  Published August 27, 2026  ·  Verified against Apache Tomcat's security pages, the published CVE record for CVE-2025-24813, CISA's KEV catalog, and the Apache Tomcat release record

There is a paragraph on Apache Tomcat's own security pages that explains, better than any security-vendor pitch ever could, why vulnerability scanners keep giving dead Tomcat installations a clean bill of health. It is not hidden. It is stated policy, in plain text, on the page most people scroll past on their way to the CVE tables:

“The published CVE records for vulnerabilities reported from 2023 onwards include affected version information for EOL versions. By default, the status for EOL versions is reported as unknown.”

And two sentences later, the part that should change how you read every scan report you have ever run against an old Tomcat: the security page “will NOT be updated if the status of an EOL version is updated” — and no email announcement is made either. Once a Tomcat version line dies, Apache stops evaluating it, defaults its status on new CVEs to unknown, and never revisits the page you would check.

To be clear about who is at fault here: not Apache. This is unusually honest vendor behavior — the policy is documented, the wording is precise, and evaluating vulnerabilities against versions nobody maintains is real work the project explicitly declines to promise for free. The failure happens downstream, in every tool and every review that treats “no known vulnerabilities” as if it meant “known to have no vulnerabilities.”

The one-sentence version: on an end-of-life Tomcat, zero new findings means zero new evaluations. “Unknown” is not “unaffected.” The silence your scanner reports is the sound of nobody checking.

Key Dates at a Glance

What the Policy Looks Like on a Real, Actively Exploited CVE

This is not a theoretical concern. Take CVE-2025-24813 — the Tomcat partial-PUT flaw that Apache titles “Potential RCE and/or information disclosure and/or information corruption”, and which sits on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, meaning it has been exploited in the wild. The machine-readable CVE record, published by Apache's own CNA, lists version status like this:

Version range Status in the CVE record Fix for that line?
11.0.0-M1 – 11.0.2 Affected Yes — fixed in a later 11.0 release
10.1.0-M1 – 10.1.34 Affected Yes — fixed in a later 10.1 release
9.0.0.M1 – 9.0.98 Affected Yes — fixed in a later 9.0 release
8.5.0 – 8.5.100 (the entire 8.5 line, through its final release) Affected No — 8.5 was already end of life; no fixed 8.5 release exists
10.0.0-M1 – 10.0.27 (the entire 10.0 line) Unknown
Tomcat 3 up to 8.5 (every release line before 8.5) Unknown

Read the bottom half of that table again. For a vulnerability confirmed to be exploited in the wild, the official status of the entire Tomcat 10.0 line — and of every version line from Tomcat 3 through 8.0, roughly two decades of releases — is a documented shrug. In this particular record Apache went further than its default and marked 8.5 as affected, which is exactly the honesty the policy allows for: “Where additional information is available, the published CVE record may be updated.” But 10.0 and everything older stayed at the default. Nobody evaluated them. Nobody will.

Why Scanners Turn “Unknown” Into “Fine”

Vulnerability scanners and software-composition tools overwhelmingly work by matching your installed version against the affected-version metadata in published CVE records. If the record says a version range is affected, you get a finding. If the record says unknown — or says nothing at all, as with vulnerabilities reported after Apache stopped listing them for a dead line — most tools emit nothing. There is no “this version stopped being evaluated” severity level. The dashboard shows green.

Which produces the perverse outcome every asset owner should sit with for a moment: the older and deader your Tomcat, the cleaner it looks. A patched, supported Tomcat 9 install accumulates findings every quarter because someone is actively evaluating it. A Tomcat 8.0 install — end of life since June 30, 2018 — accumulates silence. The reporting gradient runs exactly backwards from the risk gradient.

The Corollary: Every “N CVEs Affect Old Tomcat” Number Is an Estimate

There is a second consequence of Apache's policy that cuts the other way, against the security industry's marketing habits. Because Apache does not evaluate EOL versions, no vendor-published count of vulnerabilities affecting an end-of-life Tomcat line exists — for any line, in any direction. When a scanner vendor, a support vendor, or an article (including ours) wants to say “this many CVEs hit EOL Tomcat 8.5,” that number is necessarily the result of somebody's own analysis: their guess at which post-EOL CVEs would have applied. Some of those analyses are careful. None of them are Apache's. We do not publish such counts, and when you see one, the right question is “evaluated by whom, against what?”

What can be stated from primary sources is smaller and harder: the policy itself, the per-CVE records where Apache chose to fill in an EOL version's status — and the lifecycle dates. Those we track and verify.

Running Apache Tomcat past end of life?
Extended support past the official EOL date exists for many products in this position — whether it covers Apache Tomcat is exactly what we check. Tell us where to reach you and we’ll reply with matched options and pricing guidance — or an honest “no vendor covers this.” Free, no obligation.

Free · No obligation · Independent — we track the dates, vendors don’t pay for placement · dates verified against vendor sources. See all support options →

The Tomcat Support Map

The lifecycle facts, from the Tomcat product page we verify against Apache's own announcements. Note the EOL notice Apache attaches to the 8.x security page: “Tomcat 8.5.x has reached end of life and is no longer supported. Vulnerabilities reported after 31 March 2024 are not listed below and will not be fixed. Users should upgrade to 9.0.x or later to obtain security fixes.”

Release line First release End of life New security records since EOL Status
Tomcat 11.0 October 3, 2024 None announced Fully evaluated Supported
Tomcat 10.1 September 23, 2022 None announced Fully evaluated Supported
Tomcat 9.0 September 27, 2017 March 31, 2027 at the earliest, per Apache Fully evaluated Supported
Tomcat 8.5 March 17, 2016 March 31, 2024 “Unknown” by default; not fixed either way EOL
Tomcat 10.0 December 3, 2020 October 31, 2022 “Unknown” by default; not fixed either way EOL
Tomcat 8.0 January 29, 2014 June 30, 2018 “Unknown” by default; not fixed either way EOL
Tomcat 7 January 10, 2013 March 31, 2021 “Unknown” by default; not fixed either way EOL

The risk picture per line is live on the product page — 80 is Tomcat 8.5's current EOL Risk Score, recalculated at every build from EOL recency, attack surface, CISA KEV exposure, and extended-support availability; the full Tomcat page carries the rest. Our derivation of CISA's live KEV catalog currently attributes six actively-exploited entries to Tomcat — exposure that a scanner reading “unknown” as “clean” will never surface for a dead line.

What To Do, In Order

  1. Find your versions. Tomcat prints its version in server logs at startup, in the manager app, or via version.sh / version.bat in the bin directory. Inventory every instance — the forgotten ones are the point of this article.
  2. Treat any 8.5, 10.0, 8.0, or 7 install as unevaluated, not clean. Whatever your scanner says about it, the vendor's position is that nobody is checking. The honest severity of “unknown” on an internet-facing service is closer to “assume affected” than “no findings.”
  3. Upgrade to a supported line. Apache's stated destinations are 9.0.x or later; 9.0 is supported until March 31, 2027 at the earliest, and 10.1 and 11.0 carry no announced end date. Mind the javaxjakarta namespace change when crossing from 9.0 to 10.1+ — our Tomcat end-of-life guide covers the migration path.
  4. If you genuinely cannot move yet, commercial extended-support options exist for end-of-life Tomcat lines — the form above will match you with vetted options, free.

FAQ

Is Apache Tomcat 8.5 still supported?

No. Tomcat 8.5 reached end of life on March 31, 2024. Apache's security page states that vulnerabilities reported after that date are not listed and will not be fixed, and directs users to upgrade to 9.0.x or later.

Why does my scanner show no CVEs for an old Tomcat?

Apache reports the status of new vulnerabilities as “unknown” by default for end-of-life versions, and most scanners only raise findings on versions marked “affected.” No evaluation, no finding, green dashboard. The absence of findings is an absence of evaluation.

Is Tomcat 9 still supported?

Yes — Apache has said support for 9.0.x ends no earlier than March 31, 2027. Tomcat 10.1 and 11.0 are current with no announced end dates. Tomcat 10.0 is a different story: it reached end of life on October 31, 2022.

How many CVEs affect end-of-life Tomcat versions?

Nobody can tell you from vendor data — Apache stopped evaluating dead lines and says so. Any specific count is a third party's estimate, not an Apache-published fact. The knowable facts are the policy, the individual CVE records where Apache filled in an EOL status, and the lifecycle dates.

What to do about it

Apache Tomcat currently carries an EOL Risk Score™ of 80/100 — Grade D, high risk, recalculated at every site build from EOL recency, attack surface, CISA KEV exposure, and extended-support availability. Per-version scores and dates are on the Apache Tomcat lifecycle page.

The right response comes down to one question: how many more years does this system need to run? Under a year, extended support (where it exists) is usually cheaper than an emergency migration. One to three years, migrate — support fees paid repeatedly cost more than doing the project once. Indefinitely, migrate now and plan the next one before it surprises you. Extended support is often the more expensive choice over a multi-year horizon — a bridge, not a destination. And if this deadline feels like vendor caprice, it isn’t — why end of life is inevitable for every version, with the receipts.

Related Reading